Icelanders "reaping the benefits of anger"

Curious what folks think about this take on Iceland's economic recovery, and how it was precipitated by

Icelanders who pelted parliament with rocks in 2009 demanding their leaders and bankers answer for the country’s economic and financial collapse.

Given the positive outcome, would you be more inclined to physically pressure your government if, let's say, your country were similarly foisting the burden of the housing bubble onto working-class people, rather than financial institutions?  Is there context and nuance that you feel the article is leaving out?*   *   *[Paul Taggart/Bloomberg. "Icelandic Anger Brings Debt Relief"]